[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 06:26:44 +0000
From: <Kavyasree.Kotagiri@...rochip.com>
To: <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
CC: <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>, <lee@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [RESEND PATCH v9 2/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,sama5d2-flexcom:
Add new compatible string for lan966x
>
> On 08/09/2022 17:06, Kavyasree Kotagiri wrote:
> > LAN966x SoC flexcoms has two optional I/O lines. Namely, CS0 and CS1
> > in flexcom SPI mode. CTS and RTS in flexcom USART mode. These pins
> > can be mapped to lan966x FLEXCOM_SHARED[0-20] pins and usage
> depends on
> > functions being configured.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kavyasree Kotagiri <kavyasree.kotagiri@...rochip.com>
>
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions.
> However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/Documentation/process/subm
> itting-patches.rst#L540
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>
Yes, You are right.
I missed adding reviewed-by tag for 2/3 and 3/3 patches(which doesn't have any issues
while applying on latest version)
I haven't added tag for patch-1/3 as there is small change
(i.e., Changed reference provided for spi bindings to atmel,at91rm9200-spi.yaml)
while applying changes on latest version.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists