[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 09:17:28 +0800
From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
CC: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
<live-patching@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] kallsyms: Optimizes the performance of lookup symbols
On 2022/9/9 8:07, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 09:09:29PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
>> Currently, to search for a symbol, we need to expand the symbols in
>> 'kallsyms_names' one by one, and then use the expanded string for
>> comparison. This is very slow.
>>
>> In fact, we can first compress the name being looked up and then use
>> it for comparison when traversing 'kallsyms_names'.
>>
>> This patch series optimizes the performance of function kallsyms_lookup_name(),
>> and function klp_find_object_symbol() in the livepatch module. Based on the
>> test results, the performance overhead is reduced to 5%. That is, the
>> performance of these functions is improved by 20 times.
>>
>> To avoid increasing the kernel size in non-debug mode, the optimization is only
>> for the case CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL=y.
>
> WIthout having time yet to reveiw the implementation details, it would
> seem this is an area we may want to test for future improvements easily,
> so a selftest better yet a kunit test may be nice for this. Can you
> write one so we can easily gather a simple metric for "how long does
> this take"?
Good advice. I'll write it today.
>
> Luis
> .
>
--
Regards,
Zhen Lei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists