linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: mediatek: mt8188: Add binding for MM & INFRA IOMMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 9 Sep 2022 09:11:06 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     "Chengci.Xu" <chengci.xu@...iatek.com>,
        Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc:     iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: mediatek: mt8188: Add binding for MM
 & INFRA IOMMU

On 09/09/2022 05:20, Chengci.Xu wrote:
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause) */
>>
>> Why do you license it under BSD-3 clause?
>>
> 
> A mediatek internal wiki suggest me use "BSD-3-Clause" without detial
> reason. May be it is not suitable for this file.
> 
> If you don't approve of this, I can change this license to "GPL-2.0-
> only OR BSD-2-Clause", which is perferred by DT bindings file according
> to "submitting-patches.rst". 
> 
> Do you think "BSD-2-Clause" is OK? Or could you kindly share me another
> proper license?

Please switch to "GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause", which is preferred for
bindings.


Best regards,
Krzysztof