[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 17:30:24 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Rom Lemarchand <romlem@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND RFC] zram: Allow rw_page when page isn't written back.
On (22/09/08 08:50), Brian Geffon wrote:
[..]
> +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ enum zram_pageflags {
> ZRAM_UNDER_WB, /* page is under writeback */
> ZRAM_HUGE, /* Incompressible page */
> ZRAM_IDLE, /* not accessed page since last idle marking */
> + ZRAM_NO_WB, /* Do not allow page to be written back */
>
> __NR_ZRAM_PAGEFLAGS,
> };
Unrelated but somehow related.
I wonder if it's time for us to introduce a dedicated, say u16,
flags member to struct zram_table_entry. Unless my calculations
are extremely wrong, we are about to run out of spare bits in
zram_table_entry::flags on 32-bit systems.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists