lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 9 Sep 2022 17:54:11 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     f.fainelli@...il.com, andersson@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
        biju.das.jz@...renesas.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
        dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, geert+renesas@...der.be,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com, michael@...le.cc, shawnguo@...nel.org,
        soc@...nel.org, vkoul@...nel.org, will@...nel.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>,
        Benjamin Copeland <ben.copeland@...aro.org>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: enable ARCH_BCM

On Fri, 9 Sept 2022 at 13:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 09/09/2022 09:35, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > From: Naresh kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
> >
> >
> > On 2022-09-05 20:39, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> Commit 96796c914b84 ("arm64: Kconfig.platforms: Re-organized Broadcom
> >> menu") introduced a new symbol ARCH_BCM and made all of the Broadcom
> >> SoCs Kconfig depend on it, but did not enable it in the defconfig.
> >> Thus, now the defconfig doesn't include support for any Broadcom
> >> architectures anymore. Fix it.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 96796c914b84 ("arm64: Kconfig.platforms: Re-organized Broadcom menu")
> >> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> >
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> The patch was sent on 6th of September. Your report on 8th of September...

Understood !
Maybe off-topic,
Testing Linux next seems to be a bit late to report the regressions.
Our testing would have build and boot test devicetree/for-next or
devicetree / master branches to find early regressions.
or Any other well known maintainers trees.

Your suggestions are most welcome for improving Linux kernel quality.

Best regards
Naresh Kamboju

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ