[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0j5FO+OcX6VdiR-tuDCrHFwErquxzZGUu3ZLQ1G57T-+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2022 18:32:10 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)" <devel@...ica.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Elie Morisse <syniurge@...il.com>,
Nehal Shah <nehal-bakulchandra.shah@....com>,
Shyam Sundar S K <shyam-sundar.s-k@....com>,
Khalil Blaiech <kblaiech@...dia.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] ACPI: unify _UID handling as integer
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 3:38 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 04:29:02PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > This series is about unification on how we handle ACPI _UID when
> > it's known to be an integer-in-the-string.
> >
> > The idea of merging either all via ACPI tree, or taking ACPI stuff
> > for the v6.1 while the rest may be picked up later on by respective
> > maintainers separately
>
> >(currently all depends on Wolfram, other
> > patches have got the tags from the maintainers).
>
> I stand corrected, the perf patch is not tagged yet.
>
> > Partially compile-tested (x86-64).
Tentatively applied as 6.1 material.
If there are updates, we'll make changes as they go.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists