lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220910054700.12205-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Date:   Sat, 10 Sep 2022 11:17:00 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To:     gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com, vkoul@...nel.org
Cc:     dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] dmaengine: dw-edma: Remove runtime PM support

Currently, the dw-edma driver enables the runtime_pm for parent device
(chip->dev) and increments/decrements the refcount during alloc/free
chan resources callbacks.

This leads to a problem when the eDMA driver has been probed, but the
channels were not used. This scenario can happen when the DW PCIe driver
probes eDMA driver successfully, but the PCI EPF driver decides not to
use eDMA channels and use iATU instead for PCI transfers.

In this case, the underlying device would be runtime suspended due to
pm_runtime_enable() in dw_edma_probe() and the PCI EPF driver would have
no knowledge of it.

Ideally, the eDMA driver should not be the one doing the runtime PM of
the parent device. The responsibility should instead belong to the client
drivers like PCI EPF.

So let's remove the runtime PM support from eDMA driver.

Cc: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
Cc: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
Reviewed-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
---

Changes in v2:

 - Added review tag from Sergey
 - Rebased on top of v6.0.0-rc1

 drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c | 12 ------------
 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
index 07f756479663..c54b24ff5206 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
-#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
 #include <linux/dmaengine.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
@@ -682,15 +681,12 @@ static int dw_edma_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *dchan)
 	if (chan->status != EDMA_ST_IDLE)
 		return -EBUSY;
 
-	pm_runtime_get(chan->dw->chip->dev);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static void dw_edma_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *dchan)
 {
 	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(5000);
-	struct dw_edma_chan *chan = dchan2dw_edma_chan(dchan);
 	int ret;
 
 	while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
@@ -703,8 +699,6 @@ static void dw_edma_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *dchan)
 
 		cpu_relax();
 	}
-
-	pm_runtime_put(chan->dw->chip->dev);
 }
 
 static int dw_edma_channel_setup(struct dw_edma *dw, bool write,
@@ -977,9 +971,6 @@ int dw_edma_probe(struct dw_edma_chip *chip)
 	if (err)
 		goto err_irq_free;
 
-	/* Power management */
-	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
-
 	/* Turn debugfs on */
 	dw_edma_v0_core_debugfs_on(dw);
 
@@ -1009,9 +1000,6 @@ int dw_edma_remove(struct dw_edma_chip *chip)
 	for (i = (dw->nr_irqs - 1); i >= 0; i--)
 		free_irq(chip->ops->irq_vector(dev, i), &dw->irq[i]);
 
-	/* Power management */
-	pm_runtime_disable(dev);
-
 	/* Deregister eDMA device */
 	dma_async_device_unregister(&dw->wr_edma);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(chan, _chan, &dw->wr_edma.channels,
-- 
2.25.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ