linux-kernel - [patch RFC 01/29] printk: Make pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220910222300.406755505@linutronix.de>
Date:   Sun, 11 Sep 2022 00:27:33 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
        Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Subject: [patch RFC 01/29] printk: Make pr_flush() static

No user outside the printk code and no reason to export this.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
 include/linux/printk.h |    7 -------
 kernel/printk/printk.c |    5 +++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/printk.h
+++ b/include/linux/printk.h
@@ -169,8 +169,6 @@ extern void __printk_safe_exit(void);
 #define printk_deferred_enter __printk_safe_enter
 #define printk_deferred_exit __printk_safe_exit
 
-extern bool pr_flush(int timeout_ms, bool reset_on_progress);
-
 /*
  * Please don't use printk_ratelimit(), because it shares ratelimiting state
  * with all other unrelated printk_ratelimit() callsites.  Instead use
@@ -221,11 +219,6 @@ static inline void printk_deferred_exit(
 {
 }
 
-static inline bool pr_flush(int timeout_ms, bool reset_on_progress)
-{
-	return true;
-}
-
 static inline int printk_ratelimit(void)
 {
 	return 0;
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -2296,6 +2296,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible int _printk(const c
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(_printk);
 
+static bool pr_flush(int timeout_ms, bool reset_on_progress);
 static bool __pr_flush(struct console *con, int timeout_ms, bool reset_on_progress);
 
 #else /* CONFIG_PRINTK */
@@ -2330,6 +2331,7 @@ static void call_console_driver(struct c
 {
 }
 static bool suppress_message_printing(int level) { return false; }
+static bool pr_flush(int timeout_ms, bool reset_on_progress) { return true; }
 static bool __pr_flush(struct console *con, int timeout_ms, bool reset_on_progress) { return true; }
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_PRINTK */
@@ -3438,11 +3440,10 @@ static bool __pr_flush(struct console *c
  * Context: Process context. May sleep while acquiring console lock.
  * Return: true if all enabled printers are caught up.
  */
-bool pr_flush(int timeout_ms, bool reset_on_progress)
+static bool pr_flush(int timeout_ms, bool reset_on_progress)
 {
 	return __pr_flush(NULL, timeout_ms, reset_on_progress);
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(pr_flush);
 
 /*
  * Delayed printk version, for scheduler-internal messages: