| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CA+fCnZfLCe8fhQ5UAyF1LwZuMCfbsoEXDmX3deaW6i_E5UE60g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2022 01:12:05 +0200
From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] mm/slub: extend redzone check to extra allocated
kmalloc space than requested
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 9:11 AM Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com> wrote:
>
> kmalloc will round up the request size to a fixed size (mostly power
> of 2), so there could be a extra space than what is requested, whose
> size is the actual buffer size minus original request size.
>
> To better detect out of bound access or abuse of this space, add
> redzone sanity check for it.
>
> And in current kernel, some kmalloc user already knows the existence
> of the space and utilizes it after calling 'ksize()' to know the real
> size of the allocated buffer. So we skip the sanity check for objects
> which have been called with ksize(), as treating them as legitimate
> users.
>
> Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
> ---
> mm/slab.h | 4 ++++
> mm/slab_common.c | 4 ++++
> mm/slub.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
> index 20f9e2a9814f..0bc91b30b031 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.h
> +++ b/mm/slab.h
> @@ -885,4 +885,8 @@ void __check_heap_object(const void *ptr, unsigned long n,
> }
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
> +void skip_orig_size_check(struct kmem_cache *s, const void *object);
> +#endif
> +
> #endif /* MM_SLAB_H */
> diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
> index 8e13e3aac53f..5106667d6adb 100644
> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
> @@ -1001,6 +1001,10 @@ size_t __ksize(const void *object)
> return folio_size(folio);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
> + skip_orig_size_check(folio_slab(folio)->slab_cache, object);
> +#endif
> +
> return slab_ksize(folio_slab(folio)->slab_cache);
> }
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index f523601d3fcf..2f0302136604 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -812,12 +812,27 @@ static inline void set_orig_size(struct kmem_cache *s,
> if (!slub_debug_orig_size(s))
> return;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC
> + /*
> + * KASAN could save its free meta data in the start part of object
> + * area, so skip the redzone check if kasan's meta data size is
> + * bigger enough to possibly overlap with kmalloc redzone
> + */
> + if (s->kasan_info.free_meta_size_in_object * 2 >= s->object_size)
Why is free_meta_size_in_object multiplied by 2? Looks cryptic,
probably needs a comment.
Thanks!
> + orig_size = s->object_size;
> +#endif
> +
> p += get_info_end(s);
> p += sizeof(struct track) * 2;
>
> *(unsigned int *)p = orig_size;
> }
>
> +void skip_orig_size_check(struct kmem_cache *s, const void *object)
> +{
> + set_orig_size(s, (void *)object, s->object_size);
> +}
> +
> static unsigned int get_orig_size(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
> {
> void *p = kasan_reset_tag(object);
> @@ -949,13 +964,34 @@ static __printf(3, 4) void slab_err(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> static void init_object(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object, u8 val)
> {
> u8 *p = kasan_reset_tag(object);
> + unsigned int orig_size = s->object_size;
>
> - if (s->flags & SLAB_RED_ZONE)
> + if (s->flags & SLAB_RED_ZONE) {
> memset(p - s->red_left_pad, val, s->red_left_pad);
>
> + if (slub_debug_orig_size(s) && val == SLUB_RED_ACTIVE) {
> + unsigned int zone_start;
> +
> + orig_size = get_orig_size(s, object);
> + zone_start = orig_size;
> +
> + if (!freeptr_outside_object(s))
> + zone_start = max_t(unsigned int, orig_size,
> + s->offset + sizeof(void *));
> +
> + /*
> + * Redzone the extra allocated space by kmalloc
> + * than requested.
> + */
> + if (zone_start < s->object_size)
> + memset(p + zone_start, val,
> + s->object_size - zone_start);
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (s->flags & __OBJECT_POISON) {
> - memset(p, POISON_FREE, s->object_size - 1);
> - p[s->object_size - 1] = POISON_END;
> + memset(p, POISON_FREE, orig_size - 1);
> + p[orig_size - 1] = POISON_END;
> }
>
> if (s->flags & SLAB_RED_ZONE)
> @@ -1103,6 +1139,7 @@ static int check_object(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> {
> u8 *p = object;
> u8 *endobject = object + s->object_size;
> + unsigned int orig_size;
>
> if (s->flags & SLAB_RED_ZONE) {
> if (!check_bytes_and_report(s, slab, object, "Left Redzone",
> @@ -1112,6 +1149,20 @@ static int check_object(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> if (!check_bytes_and_report(s, slab, object, "Right Redzone",
> endobject, val, s->inuse - s->object_size))
> return 0;
> +
> + if (slub_debug_orig_size(s) && val == SLUB_RED_ACTIVE) {
> + orig_size = get_orig_size(s, object);
> +
> + if (!freeptr_outside_object(s))
> + orig_size = max_t(unsigned int, orig_size,
> + s->offset + sizeof(void *));
> + if (s->object_size > orig_size &&
> + !check_bytes_and_report(s, slab, object,
> + "kmalloc Redzone", p + orig_size,
> + val, s->object_size - orig_size)) {
> + return 0;
> + }
> + }
> } else {
> if ((s->flags & SLAB_POISON) && s->object_size < s->inuse) {
> check_bytes_and_report(s, slab, p, "Alignment padding",
> --
> 2.34.1
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kasan-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kasan-dev+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kasan-dev/20220907071023.3838692-5-feng.tang%40intel.com.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists