lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2022 08:01:21 -0400 From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>, Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org> Subject: Re: [patch RFC 00/29] printk: A new approach - WIP On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 6:27 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote: > > After taking a step back we decided to go for a radically different > approach: >From a quick look through the patches this morning, I see nothing alarming. The proof is in the pudding, but this seems to have a sane model for console list handling and for handling the individual console states. But I'm on a laptop and only read through the patches while going through my email this morning, so I may well have missed something. Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists