linux-kernel - Re: [patch RFC 00/29] printk: A new approach

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wj=CBxrztv0gs273zovMRNsG=i1jg-rf3d-aAx4WLEF1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 11 Sep 2022 08:01:21 -0400
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
        Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [patch RFC 00/29] printk: A new approach - WIP

On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 6:27 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> After taking a step back we decided to go for a radically different
> approach:

>From a quick look through the patches this morning, I see nothing
alarming. The proof is in the pudding, but this seems to have a sane
model for console list handling and for handling the individual
console states.

But I'm on a laptop and only read through the patches while going
through my email this morning, so I may well have missed something.

                 Linus