[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yx7luoAJpenWO5zK@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 09:54:34 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...gle.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/8] workqueue: Unconditionally set cpumask in
worker_attach_to_pool()
On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 04:41:28PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>
>
> If a worker is spuriously woken up after kthread_bind_mask() but before
> worker_attach_to_pool(), and there are some cpu-hot-[un]plug happening
> during the same interval, the worker task might be pushed away from its
> bound CPU with its affinity changed by the scheduler and worker_attach_to_pool()
> doesn't rebind it properly.
Can you *please* be more explicit. The above doesn't give me enough clue
to reconstruct the actual scenario you're fixing.
Draw a picture or something.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists