lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 12 Sep 2022 11:12:22 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        acme@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, will@...nel.org,
        catalin.marinas@....com, James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/7] arm64/perf: Update struct pmu_hw_events for BRBE

On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 10:40:42AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:

> +	/* Captured BRBE buffer - copied as is into perf_sample_data */
> +	struct perf_branch_stack	brbe_stack;
> +	struct perf_branch_entry	brbe_entries[BRBE_MAX_ENTRIES];

It looks like perf_branch_entry is intended to be the variably
sized entries array at the end of perf_branch_stack?  That could
probably do with being called out if it's the case.  It feels
like it would be clearer and safer to allocate these dynamically
when BRBE is used if that's possible, I'd expect that should also
deal with the stack frame size issues as well.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ