[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKXUXMzQDy-A5n8gvHaT9s21dn_ThuW0frCgm_tXMHPUhLY2zA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 15:46:32 +0200
From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: State of RFC PATCH Remove CONFIG_DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS
Hi Joe, hi Ben,
While reviewing some kernel config, I came across
CONFIG_DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS and tried to understand its purpose.
Then, I discovered this RFC patch from 2014 that seems never to have
been integrated:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/1393964591.20435.58.camel@joe-AO722/
[RFC] Remove CONFIG_DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS
The discussion seemed to just not continue and the patch was just not
integrated by anyone.
In the meantime, the use of CONFIG_DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS has spread into
a few more files, but replacing it with
CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS still seems feasible.
Are you aware of reasons that this patch from 2014 should not be integrated?
I would spend some time to move the integration of this patch further
if you consider that the patch is not completely wrong.
Best regards,
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists