lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 03:22:09 +0300 From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com> To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>, Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>, Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>, Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>, Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, willmcvicker@...gle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 20/20] PCI: dwc: Add Baikal-T1 PCIe controller support On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 09:36:46AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 2022-08-29 16:28, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > [...] > > > +static int bt1_pcie_add_port(struct bt1_pcie *btpci) > > > +{ > > > + struct device *dev = &btpci->pdev->dev; > > > + int ret; > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * DW PCIe Root Port controller is equipped with eDMA capable of > > > + * working with the 64-bit memory addresses. > > > + */ > > > + ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64)); > > > + if (ret) > > > + return ret; > > > > Is this the right place to set the DMA mask for the host controller > > embedded DMA controller (actually, the dev pointer is the _host_ > > controller device) ? > > > > How this is going to play when combined with: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/1e63a581-14ae-b4b5-a5bf-ca8f09c33af6@arm.com > > > > It is getting a bit confusing. I believe the code in the link > > above sets the mask so that through the DMA API we are capable > > of getting an MSI doorbell virtual address whose physical address > > can be addressed by the endpoint; this through the DMA API. > > > > This patch is setting the DMA mask for a different reason, namely > > setting the host controller embedded DMA controller addressing > > capabilities. > > > > AFAICS - both approaches set the mask for the same device - now > > the question is about which one is legitimate and how to handle > > the other. > > Assuming the dw-edma-pcie driver is the relevant one, that already sets its > own masks on its own device, so I also don't see why this is here. No. dw-edma-pcie has nothing to do with this driver. -Sergey > > Thanks, > Robin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists