[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yx9H1zSpxmNqx6Xc@kadam>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 17:53:11 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Nam Cao <namcaov@...il.com>
Cc: forest@...ttletooquiet.net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vt6655: fix potential memory leak
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 05:17:28PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 04:42:05PM +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> > I did not realize this initially, but this bug can cause more serious problem
> > than just a memory leak. In the case that kzalloc fails right from the
> > beginning with i=0; then in the while loop, "i" will wrap around and the code
> > will access priv->apTD0Rings[4294967295] which is obviously not good.
> >
>
> True. You probably want to resend with that added to the commit
> message. I will create a Smatch check to prevent these in the future.
>
I created a static checker warning for these and it found a bunch more
bugs in the same file.
drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c:635 device_init_rd0_ring() warn: potential decrement underflow 'i' rl='s32min-(-1)' (iterator)
drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c:636 device_init_rd0_ring() warn: using underflowed offset 'i'
drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c:681 device_init_rd1_ring() warn: potential decrement underflow 'i' rl='s32min-(-1)' (iterator)
drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c:682 device_init_rd1_ring() warn: using underflowed offset 'i'
drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c:746 device_init_td0_ring() warn: potential decrement underflow 'i' rl='s32min-(-1)' (iterator)
drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c:747 device_init_td0_ring() warn: using underflowed offset 'i'
drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c:786 device_init_td1_ring() warn: potential decrement underflow 'i' rl='s32min-(-1)' (iterator)
drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c:787 device_init_td1_ring() warn: using underflowed offset 'i'
Could you fix those as well? They're all the same bug and the same file
so I would do it all at once. They were introduced in the same patch
as well so only one Fixes tag required.
regards,
dan carpenter
View attachment "check_decrement_underflow.c" of type "text/x-csrc" (2138 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists