lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yx9RK0bDba4s02qn@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 12 Sep 2022 16:32:59 +0100
From:   "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc:     Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 net-next 6/8] net: dsa: felix: populate mac_capabilities
 for all ports

On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 11:41:18AM +0000, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 01:16:21PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > > Therefore, I think you can drop this patch from your series and
> > > you won't see any functional change.
> > 
> > This is true. I am also a bit surprised at Colin's choices to
> > (b) split the work he submitted such that he populates mac_capabilities
> >     but does not make any use of it (not call phylink_generic_validate
> >     from anywhere). We try as much as possible to not leave dead code
> >     behind in the mainline tree, even if future work is intended to
> >     bring it to life. I do understand that this is an RFC so the patches
> >     weren't intended to be applied as is, but it is still confusing to
> >     review a change which, as you've correctly pointed out, has no
> >     effect to the git tree as it stands.
> 
> Ah, I retract this comment; after actually looking at all the patches, I
> do see that in patch 8/8, Colin does call phylink_generic_validate().

Good point, I obviously missed that in the series.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ