[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220912162159.GA1397560-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 11:21:59 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
Cc: thierry.reding@...il.com, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, philipp.tomsich@...ll.eu,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, kever.yang@...k-chips.com,
zhangqing@...k-chips.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
heiko@...ech.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/11] dt-bindings: pwm: rockchip: add
rockchip,rk3128-pwm
On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 09:48:04PM +0200, Johan Jonker wrote:
> Reduced CC.
>
> Hi Rob,
>
Seemed like a simple enough warning to fix...
> The rk3328 and rv1108 PWM interrupt is chaired between blocks I think.
> For rv1108 the same interrupt is used for all PWM nodes.
> For rk3328 only added to one PWM node.
> Currently not in use in a Linux drivers??
How is that relevant to the binding? It's used in dts files.
>
> No consensus yet...on removing or parent node, so it stays as it is...
> Maybe if you have ideas things will change. ;)
Only that existing issues should be addressed before adding new
platforms especially if the binding might change in an incompatible way
(splitting nodes).
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists