[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220912172401.22301-3-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 12:23:56 -0500
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
To: <rafael@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <catalin@...ebit.com>, <philipp.zabel@...il.com>,
<travisghansen@...oo.com>, <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/6] acpi/x86: s2idle: If a new AMD _HID is missing assume Rembrandt
A mistake was made that only AMDI0007 was set to rev of "2", but
it should have been also set for AMDI008. If an ID is missing from
the _HID table, then assume it matches Rembrandt behavior.
This implicitly means that if any other behavior changes happen
in the future missing IDs must be added to that table.
Tested-by: catalin@...ebit.com
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
---
drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
index a7757551f750..a8256e5a0e8a 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ static int lps0_device_attach(struct acpi_device *adev,
if (dev_id != NULL)
data = (const struct amd_lps0_hid_device_data *) dev_id->driver_data;
else
- return 0;
+ data = &amd_rembrandt;
rev_id = data->rev_id;
lps0_dsm_func_mask = validate_dsm(adev->handle,
ACPI_LPS0_DSM_UUID_AMD, rev_id, &lps0_dsm_guid);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists