| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <69526798-93df-a4f9-c385-c9bf490cc709@kali.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 16:55:58 -0500
From: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] drm/msm/dp: fix aux-bus EP lifetime
On 9/12/22 1:10 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 12/09/2022 18:40, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> Device-managed resources allocated post component bind must be tied to
>> the lifetime of the aggregate DRM device or they will not necessarily be
>> released when binding of the aggregate device is deferred.
>>
>> This can lead resource leaks or failure to bind the aggregate device
>> when binding is later retried and a second attempt to allocate the
>> resources is made.
>>
>> For the DP aux-bus, an attempt to populate the bus a second time will
>> simply fail ("DP AUX EP device already populated").
>>
>> Fix this by amending the DP aux interface and tying the lifetime of the
>> EP device to the DRM device rather than DP controller platform device.
>
> Doug, could you please take a look?
>
> For me this is another reminder/pressure point that we should populate
> the AUX BUS from the probe(), before binding the components together.
>
>>
>> Fixes: c3bf8e21b38a ("drm/msm/dp: Add eDP support via aux_bus")
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.19
>> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_aux_bus.c | 5 +++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 3 ++-
>> include/drm/display/drm_dp_aux_bus.h | 6 +++---
>> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
>> index d7483c13c569..6127979370cb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
>> @@ -719,7 +719,7 @@ static int ps8640_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> - ret = devm_of_dp_aux_populate_bus(&ps_bridge->aux,
>> ps8640_bridge_link_panel);
>> + ret = devm_of_dp_aux_populate_bus(dev, &ps_bridge->aux,
>> ps8640_bridge_link_panel);
>> /*
>> * If devm_of_dp_aux_populate_bus() returns -ENODEV then it's
>> up to
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_aux_bus.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_aux_bus.c
>> index f5741b45ca07..2706f2cf82f7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_aux_bus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_aux_bus.c
>> @@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ static void of_dp_aux_depopulate_bus_void(void
>> *data)
>> /**
>> * devm_of_dp_aux_populate_bus() - devm wrapper for
>> of_dp_aux_populate_bus()
>> + * @dev: Device to tie the lifetime of the EP devices to
>> * @aux: The AUX channel whose device we want to populate
>> * @done_probing: Callback functions to call after EP device
>> finishes probing.
>> * Will not be called if there are no EP devices and
>> this
>> @@ -333,7 +334,7 @@ static void of_dp_aux_depopulate_bus_void(void
>> *data)
>> * no children. The done_probing() function won't be called
>> in that
>> * case.
>> */
>> -int devm_of_dp_aux_populate_bus(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
>> +int devm_of_dp_aux_populate_bus(struct device *dev, struct
>> drm_dp_aux *aux,
>> int (*done_probing)(struct drm_dp_aux *aux))
>> {
>> int ret;
>> @@ -342,7 +343,7 @@ int devm_of_dp_aux_populate_bus(struct drm_dp_aux
>> *aux,
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> - return devm_add_action_or_reset(aux->dev,
>> + return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev,
>> of_dp_aux_depopulate_bus_void, aux);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_of_dp_aux_populate_bus);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> index ba557328710a..e1aa6355bbf6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> @@ -1559,7 +1559,8 @@ static int dp_display_get_next_bridge(struct
>> msm_dp *dp)
>> * panel driver is probed asynchronously but is the best we
>> * can do without a bigger driver reorganization.
>> */
>> - rc = devm_of_dp_aux_populate_ep_devices(dp_priv->aux);
>> + rc = devm_of_dp_aux_populate_ep_devices(dp->drm_dev->dev,
>> + dp_priv->aux);
>> of_node_put(aux_bus);
>> if (rc)
>> goto error;
>> diff --git a/include/drm/display/drm_dp_aux_bus.h
>> b/include/drm/display/drm_dp_aux_bus.h
>> index 8a0a486383c5..a4063aa7fc40 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/display/drm_dp_aux_bus.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/display/drm_dp_aux_bus.h
>> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static inline struct dp_aux_ep_driver
>> *to_dp_aux_ep_drv(struct device_driver *dr
>> int of_dp_aux_populate_bus(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
>> int (*done_probing)(struct drm_dp_aux *aux));
>> void of_dp_aux_depopulate_bus(struct drm_dp_aux *aux);
>> -int devm_of_dp_aux_populate_bus(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
>> +int devm_of_dp_aux_populate_bus(struct device *dev, struct
>> drm_dp_aux *aux,
>> int (*done_probing)(struct drm_dp_aux *aux));
>> /* Deprecated versions of the above functions. To be removed when
>> no callers. */
>> @@ -61,11 +61,11 @@ static inline int
>> of_dp_aux_populate_ep_devices(struct drm_dp_aux *aux)
>> return (ret != -ENODEV) ? ret : 0;
>> }
>> -static inline int devm_of_dp_aux_populate_ep_devices(struct
>> drm_dp_aux *aux)
>> +static inline int devm_of_dp_aux_populate_ep_devices(struct device
>> *dev, struct drm_dp_aux *aux)
>> {
>> int ret;
>> - ret = devm_of_dp_aux_populate_bus(aux, NULL);
>> + ret = devm_of_dp_aux_populate_bus(dev, aux, NULL);
>> /* New API returns -ENODEV for no child case; adapt to old
>> assumption */
>> return (ret != -ENODEV) ? ret : 0;
>
This breaks builds which have ti-sn65dsi86 included:
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c:628:50: error: passing argument 1
of 'devm_of_dp_aux_populate_ep_devices' from incompatible argument type.
As well,
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c:628:15: error: too few arguments
to function 'devm_of_dp_aux_populate_ep_devices'
--steev
Powered by blists - more mailing lists