[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220913140416.891620574@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 16:04:04 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Wang Yugui <wangyugui@...-tech.com>,
Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.19 138/192] btrfs: fix the max chunk size and stripe length calculation
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
[ Upstream commit 5da431b71d4b9be3c8cf6786eff9e2d41a5f9f65 ]
[BEHAVIOR CHANGE]
Since commit f6fca3917b4d ("btrfs: store chunk size in space-info
struct"), btrfs no longer can create larger data chunks than 1G:
mkfs.btrfs -f -m raid1 -d raid0 $dev1 $dev2 $dev3 $dev4
mount $dev1 $mnt
btrfs balance start --full $mnt
btrfs balance start --full $mnt
umount $mnt
btrfs ins dump-tree -t chunk $dev1 | grep "DATA|RAID0" -C 2
Before that offending commit, what we got is a 4G data chunk:
item 6 key (FIRST_CHUNK_TREE CHUNK_ITEM 9492758528) itemoff 15491 itemsize 176
length 4294967296 owner 2 stripe_len 65536 type DATA|RAID0
io_align 65536 io_width 65536 sector_size 4096
num_stripes 4 sub_stripes 1
Now what we got is only 1G data chunk:
item 6 key (FIRST_CHUNK_TREE CHUNK_ITEM 6271533056) itemoff 15491 itemsize 176
length 1073741824 owner 2 stripe_len 65536 type DATA|RAID0
io_align 65536 io_width 65536 sector_size 4096
num_stripes 4 sub_stripes 1
This will increase the number of data chunks by the number of devices,
not only increase system chunk usage, but also greatly increase mount
time.
Without a proper reason, we should not change the max chunk size.
[CAUSE]
Previously, we set max data chunk size to 10G, while max data stripe
length to 1G.
Commit f6fca3917b4d ("btrfs: store chunk size in space-info struct")
completely ignored the 10G limit, but use 1G max stripe limit instead,
causing above shrink in max data chunk size.
[FIX]
Fix the max data chunk size to 10G, and in decide_stripe_size_regular()
we limit stripe_size to 1G manually.
This should only affect data chunks, as for metadata chunks we always
set the max stripe size the same as max chunk size (256M or 1G
depending on fs size).
Now the same script result the same old result:
item 6 key (FIRST_CHUNK_TREE CHUNK_ITEM 9492758528) itemoff 15491 itemsize 176
length 4294967296 owner 2 stripe_len 65536 type DATA|RAID0
io_align 65536 io_width 65536 sector_size 4096
num_stripes 4 sub_stripes 1
Reported-by: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@...-tech.com>
Fixes: f6fca3917b4d ("btrfs: store chunk size in space-info struct")
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
fs/btrfs/space-info.c | 2 +-
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/space-info.c b/fs/btrfs/space-info.c
index b0c5b4738b1f7..17623e6410c5d 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/space-info.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/space-info.c
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static u64 calc_chunk_size(const struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 flags)
ASSERT(flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK);
if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA)
- return SZ_1G;
+ return BTRFS_MAX_DATA_CHUNK_SIZE;
else if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM)
return SZ_32M;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 3460fd6743807..16e01fbdcec83 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -5266,6 +5266,9 @@ static int decide_stripe_size_regular(struct alloc_chunk_ctl *ctl,
ctl->stripe_size);
}
+ /* Stripe size should not go beyond 1G. */
+ ctl->stripe_size = min_t(u64, ctl->stripe_size, SZ_1G);
+
/* Align to BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN */
ctl->stripe_size = round_down(ctl->stripe_size, BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN);
ctl->chunk_size = ctl->stripe_size * data_stripes;
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists