linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.19 167/192] bonding: accept unsolicited NA message

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220913140418.351316425@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 13 Sep 2022 16:04:33 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, LiLiang <liali@...hat.com>,
        Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.19 167/192] bonding: accept unsolicited NA message

From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit 592335a4164c3c41f57967223a1e1efe3a0c6eb3 ]

The unsolicited NA message with all-nodes multicast dest address should
be valid, as this also means the link could reach the target.

Also rename bond_validate_ns() to bond_validate_na().

Reported-by: LiLiang <liali@...hat.com>
Fixes: 5e1eeef69c0f ("bonding: NS target should accept link local address")
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 01b58b7e7f165..bff0bfd10e235 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -3174,12 +3174,19 @@ static bool bond_has_this_ip6(struct bonding *bond, struct in6_addr *addr)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void bond_validate_ns(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave,
+static void bond_validate_na(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave,
 			     struct in6_addr *saddr, struct in6_addr *daddr)
 {
 	int i;
 
-	if (ipv6_addr_any(saddr) || !bond_has_this_ip6(bond, daddr)) {
+	/* Ignore NAs that:
+	 * 1. Source address is unspecified address.
+	 * 2. Dest address is neither all-nodes multicast address nor
+	 *    exist on bond interface.
+	 */
+	if (ipv6_addr_any(saddr) ||
+	    (!ipv6_addr_equal(daddr, &in6addr_linklocal_allnodes) &&
+	     !bond_has_this_ip6(bond, daddr))) {
 		slave_dbg(bond->dev, slave->dev, "%s: sip %pI6c tip %pI6c not found\n",
 			  __func__, saddr, daddr);
 		return;
@@ -3222,14 +3229,14 @@ static int bond_na_rcv(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bond,
 	 * see bond_arp_rcv().
 	 */
 	if (bond_is_active_slave(slave))
-		bond_validate_ns(bond, slave, saddr, daddr);
+		bond_validate_na(bond, slave, saddr, daddr);
 	else if (curr_active_slave &&
 		 time_after(slave_last_rx(bond, curr_active_slave),
 			    curr_active_slave->last_link_up))
-		bond_validate_ns(bond, slave, saddr, daddr);
+		bond_validate_na(bond, slave, saddr, daddr);
 	else if (curr_arp_slave &&
 		 bond_time_in_interval(bond, slave_last_tx(curr_arp_slave), 1))
-		bond_validate_ns(bond, slave, saddr, daddr);
+		bond_validate_na(bond, slave, saddr, daddr);
 
 out:
 	return RX_HANDLER_ANOTHER;
-- 
2.35.1