linux-kernel - Re: [External] Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] erofs: remove duplicated unregister

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8c17fa4d-96a3-36e7-38db-17673c4bf552@bytedance.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Sep 2022 12:37:43 +0800
From:   Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@...edance.com>
To:     JeffleXu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, xiang@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        yinxin.x@...edance.com, huyue2@...lpad.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] erofs: remove duplicated
 unregister_cookie



在 2022/9/9 17:55, JeffleXu 写道:
> 
> 
> On 9/2/22 6:53 PM, Jia Zhu wrote:
>> In erofs umount scenario, erofs_fscache_unregister_cookie() is called
>> twice in kill_sb() and put_super().
>>
>> It works for original semantics, cause 'ctx' will be set to NULL in
>> put_super() and will not be unregister again in kill_sb().
>> However, in shared domain scenario, we use refcount to maintain the
>> lifecycle of cookie. Unregister the cookie twice will cause it to be
>> released early.
>>
>> For the above reasons, this patch removes duplicate unregister_cookie
>> and move fscache_unregister_* before shotdown_super() to prevent busy
>> inode(ctx->inode) when umount.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@...edance.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/erofs/super.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/erofs/super.c b/fs/erofs/super.c
>> index 69de1731f454..667a78f0ee70 100644
>> --- a/fs/erofs/super.c
>> +++ b/fs/erofs/super.c
>> @@ -919,19 +919,20 @@ static void erofs_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
>>   		kill_litter_super(sb);
>>   		return;
>>   	}
>> -	if (erofs_is_fscache_mode(sb))
>> -		generic_shutdown_super(sb);
>> -	else
>> -		kill_block_super(sb);
>> -
>>   	sbi = EROFS_SB(sb);
>>   	if (!sbi)
>>   		return;
>>   
>> +	if (erofs_is_fscache_mode(sb)) {
>> +		erofs_fscache_unregister_cookie(&sbi->s_fscache);
>> +		erofs_fscache_unregister_fs(sb);
>> +		generic_shutdown_super(sb);
> 
> Generally we can't do clean ups before generic_shutdown_super(), since
> generic_shutdown_super() may trigger IO, e.g. in sync_filesystem(),
> though it's not the case for erofs (read-only).
> 
> How about embedding erofs_fscache_unregister_cookie() into
> erofs_fscache_unregister_fs(), and thus we can check domain_id in
> erofs_fscache_unregister_fs()?
> 
Thanks.
>> +	} else {
>> +		kill_block_super(sb);
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	erofs_free_dev_context(sbi->devs);
>>   	fs_put_dax(sbi->dax_dev, NULL);
>> -	erofs_fscache_unregister_cookie(&sbi->s_fscache);
>> -	erofs_fscache_unregister_fs(sb);
>>   	kfree(sbi->opt.fsid);
>>   	kfree(sbi->opt.domain_id);
>>   	kfree(sbi);
>> @@ -951,7 +952,6 @@ static void erofs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
>>   	iput(sbi->managed_cache);
>>   	sbi->managed_cache = NULL;
>>   #endif
>> -	erofs_fscache_unregister_cookie(&sbi->s_fscache);
>>   }
>>   
>>   struct file_system_type erofs_fs_type = {
>