[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e7131ce1fd0a24f51450ffe5cc4c4f9d7a3411ad.camel@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 05:03:53 +0000
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: "sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"wander@...hat.com" <wander@...hat.com>,
"tim.gardner@...onical.com" <tim.gardner@...onical.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"isaku.yamahata@...il.com" <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"marcelo.cerri@...onical.com" <marcelo.cerri@...onical.com>,
"Cox, Philip" <philip.cox@...onical.com>,
"khalid.elmously@...onical.com" <khalid.elmously@...onical.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/3] x86/tdx: Add TDX Guest attestation interface
driver
On Mon, 2022-09-12 at 19:44 -0700, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
>
> On 9/12/22 6:25 PM, Huang, Kai wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c
> > > index 928dcf7a20d9..8b5c59110321 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c
> > > @@ -5,16 +5,21 @@
> > > #define pr_fmt(fmt) "tdx: " fmt
> > >
> > > #include <linux/cpufeature.h>
> > > +#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> > > +#include <linux/mm.h>
> > > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > Sorry perhaps I am missing something, but what is the reason to include
> > <linux/mm.h>?
>
> It is included for kmalloc/kfree, file related structs and copy_{from|to}_user().
>
> >
> > <linux/io.h> is for virt_to_phys()?
>
> Yes
>
> >
> > And should we explicitly include <linux/uaccess.h> for copy_{from|to}_user(),
>
> mm.h covers it. So I don't think we should explicitly include it.
>
> > and include the header (<linux/string.h> ?) for memchr_inv()?
>
> One of the previous headers includes linux/string.h (I am not sure which one).
> So why include it explicitly?
>
OK.
--
Thanks,
-Kai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists