lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 13 Sep 2022 16:38:15 -0500
From:   Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To:     Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@...il.com>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115: Add basic soc dtsi

On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 05:32:11PM +0300, Iskren Chernev wrote:
[..]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi
[..]
> +
> +	smem {
> +		compatible = "qcom,smem";

Please move the compatible, qcom,rpm-msg-ram and hwlocks into the
&smem_mem node.

> +		memory-region = <&smem_mem>;
> +		qcom,rpm-msg-ram = <&rpm_msg_ram>;
> +		hwlocks = <&tcsr_mutex 3>;
> +	};
> +
> +	soc: soc {

I expect that you should be told that you're missing a @0 on your soc.

> +		compatible = "simple-bus";
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <1>;
> +		ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>;
> +
> +		tlmm: pinctrl@...000 {

Please sort your nodes based on address, followed by node name
alphabetically, followed by label.

> +			compatible = "qcom,sm6115-tlmm";
> +			reg = <0x500000 0x400000>, <0x900000 0x400000>, <0xd00000 0x400000>;

Please pad your address to 8 digits, to make it faster to see if the
sort order makes sense.

> +			reg-names = "west", "south", "east";
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 227 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			gpio-controller;
> +			gpio-ranges = <&tlmm 0 0 121>;
> +			#gpio-cells = <2>;
> +			interrupt-controller;
> +			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
> +
[..]
> +	};
> +
> +	timer {
> +		compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
> +		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 1 0xf08>,
> +			     <GIC_PPI 2 0xf08>,
> +			     <GIC_PPI 3 0xf08>,
> +			     <GIC_PPI 0 0xf08>;

Please use (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(8) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW) for your flags.

Regards,
Bjorn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ