[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220913081548.gmngjwuagbt63j7h@wse-c0155>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:15:48 +0200
From: Casper Andersson <casper.casan@...il.com>
To: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@...gle.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sparx5: Fix return type of sparx5_port_xmit_impl
Hi,
On 2022-09-12 14:44, Nathan Huckleberry wrote:
> The ndo_start_xmit field in net_device_ops is expected to be of type
> netdev_tx_t (*ndo_start_xmit)(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev).
>
> The mismatched return type breaks forward edge kCFI since the underlying
> function definition does not match the function hook definition.
>
> The return type of sparx5_port_xmit_impl should be changed from int to
> netdev_tx_t.
I noticed that the functions that assign the return value inside
sparx5_port_xmit_impl also have return type int, which would ideally
also be changed. But a bigger issue might be that
sparx5_ptp_txtstamp_request and sparx5_inject (called inside
sparx5_port_xmit_impl) returns -EBUSY (-16), when they should return
NETDEV_TX_BUSY (16). If this is an issue then it also needs to be fixed.
sparx5_fdma_xmit also has int return type, but always returns
NETDEV_TX_OK right now.
Best Regards,
Casper
Powered by blists - more mailing lists