linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nfsd tree with the cel-fixes tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220913122734.431114ef@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 13 Sep 2022 12:27:34 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nfsd tree with the cel-fixes
 tree

Hi Chuck,

On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 01:47:01 +0000 Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> nfsd's for-next is currently based on v6.0-rc5, which does not have
> 00801cd92d91 ("NFSD: fix regression with setting ACLs.") yet. Next
> week I will rebase nfsd's for-next on v6.0-rc6, which should resolve
> this conflict. I will test the conflict resolution with the usual suite
> of NFSD check-in tests before pushing that update to for-next.

Why not just merge the cel-fixes tree into the nfsd tree (with this
fixup in the merge) and not pick up all the rest of -rc6.  Also will
save a rebase ;-)

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped