lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:31:58 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     perex@...ex.cz, Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, tiwai@...e.com, Xiubo.Lee@...il.com,
        lgirdwood@...il.com, nicoleotsuka@...il.com,
        shengjiu.wang@...il.com, festevam@...il.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: imx-card: Fix refcount issue with of_node_put

On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 17:00:01 +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> imx_card_parse_of will search all the node with loop,
> if there is defer probe happen in the middle of loop,
> the previous released codec node will be released
> twice, then cause refcount issue.
> 
> Here assign NULL to pointer of released nodes to fix
> the issue.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   broonie/sound.git for-linus

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: imx-card: Fix refcount issue with of_node_put
      commit: d56ba9a04d7548d4149c46ec86a0e3cc41a70f4a

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ