[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1825234b-f17a-dea4-38f6-ba5881ab9a3d@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:57:35 -0700
From: Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
- <devicetree-spec@...r.kernel.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] mm: introduce Designated Movable Blocks
On 9/14/2022 6:21 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 2:57 PM Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> MOTIVATION:
>> Some Broadcom devices (e.g. 7445, 7278) contain multiple memory
>> controllers with each mapped in a different address range within
>> a Uniform Memory Architecture. Some users of these systems have
>> expressed the desire to locate ZONE_MOVABLE memory on each
>> memory controller to allow user space intensive processing to
>> make better use of the additional memory bandwidth.
>> Unfortunately, the historical monotonic layout of zones would
>> mean that if the lowest addressed memory controller contains
>> ZONE_MOVABLE memory then all of the memory available from
>> memory controllers at higher addresses must also be in the
>> ZONE_MOVABLE zone. This would force all kernel memory accesses
>> onto the lowest addressed memory controller and significantly
>> reduce the amount of memory available for non-movable
>> allocations.
>
> Why are you sending kernel patches to the Devicetree specification list?
>
> Rob
My apologies if this is a problem. No offense was intended.
My process has been to run my patches through get_maintainers.pl to get
the list of addresses to copy on submissions and my
0016-dt-bindings-reserved-memory-introduce-designated-mov.patch
solicited the
'- <devicetree-spec@...r.kernel.org>' address.
My preference when reviewing is to receive an entire patch set to
understand the context of an individual commit, but I can certainly
understand that others may have different preferences.
It was my understanding that the Devicetree specification list was part
of the kernel (e.g. @vger.kernel.org) and would be willing to receive
patches that might be of relevance to it.
I am inexperienced with yaml and devicetree processes in general so I
have tried to lean on the examples of other reserved-memory node
bindings for help.
There is much to learn and I am happy to modify my process to better
accommodate your needs.
Regards,
Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists