lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220913175210.50945edb0738bf95300dc500@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 13 Sep 2022 17:52:10 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
Cc:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Robert Elliott <elliott@....com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 1/2] x86: crypto: kmsan: revert !KMSAN
 dependencies

On Fri,  9 Sep 2022 11:58:10 +0200 Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com> wrote:

> This patch reverts "crypto: Kconfig: fix up for "crypto: kmsan: disable
> accelerated configs under KMSAN" used by Stephen Rothwell to cleanly
> merge KMSAN patches into linux-next.
> 
> Because now arch-specific crypto configs reside in a separate Kconfig
> file, we can disable them all by adding a single !KMSAN before including
> that file (done in the following patch).
> 
> Among others, this patch reverts !KMSAN check for
> CONFIG_CRYPTO_AEGIS128_SIMD, which is ARM-only and is hence unnecessary,
> because KMSAN does not support ARM yet.

As I understand it, these patches are against linux-next and only
linux-next because they pertain to linux-next's resolution of conflicts
between the MM tree and the crypto tree?

I'm not sure how to handle that, even if anyone wants to.  How about
you send an update to
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm's mm-unstable
branch so the code which is there makes sense?  Then we'll ask Stephen
to redo the crypto tree resolution?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ