[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0b67df9e-7f64-e710-5928-2098ed8d0f2d@molgen.mpg.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 08:36:43 +0200
From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: song@...nel.org, logang@...tatee.com, guoqing.jiang@...ux.dev,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yukuai3@...wei.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] md/raid10: cleanup wait_barrier()
Dear Yu,
Thank you for the improved patch. Three minor nits.
Am 14.09.22 um 03:49 schrieb Yu Kuai:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
In the summary/title, I’d spell *Clean up* with a space. Maybe even use:
md/raid10: Factor out code from wait_barrier() to stop_waiting_barrier()
> Currently the nasty condition is wait_barrier() is hard to read. This
> patch factor out the condition into a function.
The first *is* above can be removed, and factor*s* needs an s.
> There are no functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/raid10.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> index 64d6e4cd8a3a..56458a53043d 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> @@ -957,44 +957,52 @@ static void lower_barrier(struct r10conf *conf)
> wake_up(&conf->wait_barrier);
> }
>
> +static bool stop_waiting_barrier(struct r10conf *conf)
> +{
> + /* barrier is dropped */
> + if (!conf->barrier)
> + return true;
> +
> + /*
> + * If there are already pending requests (preventing the barrier from
> + * rising completely), and the pre-process bio queue isn't empty, then
> + * don't wait, as we need to empty that queue to get the nr_pending
> + * count down.
> + */
> + if (atomic_read(&conf->nr_pending)) {
> + struct bio_list *bio_list = current->bio_list;
> +
> + if (bio_list && (!bio_list_empty(&bio_list[0]) ||
> + !bio_list_empty(&bio_list[1])))
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + /* move on if recovery thread is blocked by us */
> + if (conf->mddev->thread->tsk == current &&
> + test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &conf->mddev->recovery) &&
> + conf->nr_queued > 0)
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static bool wait_barrier(struct r10conf *conf, bool nowait)
> {
> bool ret = true;
>
> spin_lock_irq(&conf->resync_lock);
> if (conf->barrier) {
> - struct bio_list *bio_list = current->bio_list;
> - conf->nr_waiting++;
> - /* Wait for the barrier to drop.
> - * However if there are already pending
> - * requests (preventing the barrier from
> - * rising completely), and the
> - * pre-process bio queue isn't empty,
> - * then don't wait, as we need to empty
> - * that queue to get the nr_pending
> - * count down.
> - */
> /* Return false when nowait flag is set */
> if (nowait) {
> ret = false;
> } else {
> + conf->nr_waiting++;
> raid10_log(conf->mddev, "wait barrier");
> wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_barrier,
> - !conf->barrier ||
> - (atomic_read(&conf->nr_pending) &&
> - bio_list &&
> - (!bio_list_empty(&bio_list[0]) ||
> - !bio_list_empty(&bio_list[1]))) ||
> - /* move on if recovery thread is
> - * blocked by us
> - */
> - (conf->mddev->thread->tsk == current &&
> - test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING,
> - &conf->mddev->recovery) &&
> - conf->nr_queued > 0),
> + stop_waiting_barrier(conf),
> conf->resync_lock);
> + conf->nr_waiting--;
> }
> - conf->nr_waiting--;
> if (!conf->nr_waiting)
> wake_up(&conf->wait_barrier);
> }
Acked-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
Kind regards,
Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists