[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b87331960933687145688308e2ab97a@walle.cc>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:27:19 +0200
From: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To: Yaliang Wang <Yaliang.Wang@...driver.com>
Cc: tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com, pratyush@...nel.org,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: gigadevice: gd25q256: replace
gd25q256_default_init with gd25q256_post_bfpt
Am 2022-09-14 05:05, schrieb Yaliang Wang:
> In case the mail list can't receive the email, I'd like to send the
> email again.
>
> Sorry, I didn't make it clear.
> I'm doing this because the flash info member parse_sfdp is initialized
> to "true" by PARSE_SFDP macro, as you can see below
> { "gd25q256", INFO(0xc84019, 0, 64 * 1024, 512)
> PARSE_SFDP
> FLAGS(SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK | SPI_NOR_HAS_TB |
> SPI_NOR_TB_SR_BIT6)
> FIXUP_FLAGS(SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES)
> .fixups = &gd25q256_fixups },
>
> And when parse_sfdp is true, the function spi_nor_init_params() will
> call spi_nor_parse_sfdp() to initialize the parameters, and I can't
> see any other place to call the original default_init() hook in the
> fixups other than in spi_nor_init_params_deprecated() ->
> spi_nor_manufacturer_init_params().
>
> After checking the history of why we are adding this, that is to say
> the commit 48e4d973aefe ("mtd: spi-nor: Add a default_init() fixup
> hook for gd25q256") and the corresponding disscusions, I believe it
> was added for some reason, and we need to add back this function.
>
> On 9/13/22 18:46, Vanessa Page wrote:
>> **[Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
>>
>> Why are you doing this?
Vanessa Page is a bot/troll.
-michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists