lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <33471742-634b-8fcb-dd56-e396c4e788f5@foss.st.com> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:55:35 +0200 From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com> To: Deepak Kumar Singh <quic_deesin@...cinc.com>, <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>, <swboyd@...omium.org>, <quic_clew@...cinc.com>, <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org> CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] rpmsg: glink: Add lock to avoid race when rpmsg device is released The commit subject should start with "rpmsg: char:" no glink driver update... Regards, Arnaud On 9/12/22 19:05, Deepak Kumar Singh wrote: > When remote host goes down glink char device channel is freed and > associated rpdev is destroyed through rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_destroy(), > At the same time user space apps can still try to open/poll rpmsg > char device which will result in calling rpmsg_create_ept()/rpmsg_poll(). > These functions will try to reference rpdev which has already been freed > through rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_destroy(). > > File operation functions and device removal function must be protected > with lock. This patch adds existing ept lock in remove function as well. > > Signed-off-by: Deepak Kumar Singh <quic_deesin@...cinc.com> > --- > drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c > index 4f21891..5500dc0 100644 > --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c > +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c > @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ int rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_destroy(struct device *dev, void *data) > struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev = dev_to_eptdev(dev); > > mutex_lock(&eptdev->ept_lock); > + eptdev->rpdev = NULL; > if (eptdev->ept) { > rpmsg_destroy_ept(eptdev->ept); > eptdev->ept = NULL; > @@ -126,6 +127,11 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) > return -EBUSY; > } > > + if (!eptdev->rpdev) { > + mutex_unlock(&eptdev->ept_lock); > + return -ENETRESET; > + } > + > get_device(dev); > > /* > @@ -277,7 +283,9 @@ static __poll_t rpmsg_eptdev_poll(struct file *filp, poll_table *wait) > if (!skb_queue_empty(&eptdev->queue)) > mask |= EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM; > > + mutex_lock(&eptdev->ept_lock); > mask |= rpmsg_poll(eptdev->ept, filp, wait); > + mutex_unlock(&eptdev->ept_lock); > > return mask; > }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists