linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] spmi: pmic-arb: Add support for PMIC v7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YyG5vRgsejk7Y0DH@matsya>
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2022 16:53:41 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     David Collins <quic_collinsd@...cinc.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        David Dai <daidavid1@...eaurora.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] spmi: pmic-arb: Add support for PMIC v7

On 30-08-22, 14:11, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Vinod Koul (2022-08-29 21:36:00)
> > On 29-08-22, 15:25, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-06-18 08:29:58)
> > > > On 01/05/2022 22:41, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > > On 22/02/2022 19:53, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > > >> On 01-02-22, 19:11, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > > >>> Hello,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The is version 3 of support for PMIC v7. I have added a new property
> > > > >>> qcom,bus-id for supporting v7 and then add driver changes for v7
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> This depends on yaml conversion patch:
> > > > >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20211227170151.73116-1-david@ixit.cz/ 
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Any feedback on this...
> > > > > 
> > > > > Another gracious reminder about these patches. At this moment this is 
> > > > > one of the important pieces lacking for the full SM8450 support in the 
> > > > > upstream kernel.
> > > > 
> > > > Stephen, yet another ping. This is the blocking point for the further 
> > > > SM8450 progress.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Sorry I completely missed this one as it fell off the end of my inbox
> > > into the abyss.
> > 
> > Thanks for the reply. Is this applied now or you have some feedback for
> > me to address..
> > 
> 
> Does it apply along with the series from qcom[1]? I have to check and
> make sure they both work together.

There were conflicts, I have resolved, tested on top of spmi/next again
and posted the v4 now.. Hope this would get in.

-- 
~Vinod