lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c3cc265-869b-b2fc-43f2-d2cbd0bc142c@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2022 04:36:02 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc:     "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
        Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>,
        Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>,
        marcelo.cerri@...onical.com, tim.gardner@...onical.com,
        khalid.elmously@...onical.com, philip.cox@...onical.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/3] x86/tdx: Add TDX Guest attestation interface
 driver

On 9/9/22 12:27, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> 
>  arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c         | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/tdx.h |  56 ++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 171 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/tdx.h

The SEV equivalent of this in in:

	drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c

right?

Why did you choose a different location?  Also, can you please study the
SEV implementation a bit?  It might help you find problems like the
ioctl() return code issue.  The SEV driver appears to have gotten that
right.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ