[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5577971-946e-405b-b0ee-23b556ea3f72@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 14:47:43 +0100
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...wei.com>, <acme@...nel.org>,
<peterz@...radead.org>, <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
<leo.yan@...aro.org>, <james.clark@....com>, <will@...nel.org>,
<mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<suzuki.poulose@....com>, <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
<mike.leach@...aro.org>
CC: <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <helgaas@...nel.org>,
<lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
<prime.zeng@...wei.com>, <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>,
<linuxarm@...wei.com>, <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>,
<liuqi6124@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v12 1/3] perf tool: arm: Refactor event list
iteration in auxtrace_record__init()
On 14/09/2022 08:59, Yicong Yang wrote:
> From: Qi Liu <liuqi115@...wei.com>
>
> Add find_pmu_for_event() and use to simplify logic in
> auxtrace_record_init(). find_pmu_for_event() will be
> reused in subsequent patches.
>
> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qi Liu <liuqi115@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/arch/arm/util/auxtrace.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/auxtrace.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/auxtrace.c
> index 5fc6a2a3dbc5..384c7cfda0fd 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/auxtrace.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/auxtrace.c
> @@ -50,16 +50,32 @@ static struct perf_pmu **find_all_arm_spe_pmus(int *nr_spes, int *err)
> return arm_spe_pmus;
> }
>
> +static struct perf_pmu *find_pmu_for_event(struct perf_pmu **pmus,
> + int pmu_nr, struct evsel *evsel)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + if (!pmus)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < pmu_nr; i++) {
> + if (evsel->core.attr.type == pmus[i]->type)
> + return pmus[i];
> + }
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> struct auxtrace_record
> *auxtrace_record__init(struct evlist *evlist, int *err)
> {
> - struct perf_pmu *cs_etm_pmu;
> + struct perf_pmu *cs_etm_pmu = NULL;
> + struct perf_pmu **arm_spe_pmus = NULL;
> struct evsel *evsel;
> - bool found_etm = false;
> + struct perf_pmu *found_etm = NULL;
> struct perf_pmu *found_spe = NULL;
> - struct perf_pmu **arm_spe_pmus = NULL;
> + int auxtrace_event_cnt = 0;
> int nr_spes = 0;
> - int i = 0;
>
> if (!evlist)
> return NULL;
> @@ -68,24 +84,23 @@ struct auxtrace_record
> arm_spe_pmus = find_all_arm_spe_pmus(&nr_spes, err);
>
> evlist__for_each_entry(evlist, evsel) {
> - if (cs_etm_pmu &&
> - evsel->core.attr.type == cs_etm_pmu->type)
> - found_etm = true;
> -
> - if (!nr_spes || found_spe)
> - continue;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < nr_spes; i++) {
> - if (evsel->core.attr.type == arm_spe_pmus[i]->type) {
> - found_spe = arm_spe_pmus[i];
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> + if (cs_etm_pmu && !found_etm)
> + found_etm = find_pmu_for_event(&cs_etm_pmu, 1, evsel);
> +
> + if (arm_spe_pmus && !found_spe)
> + found_spe = find_pmu_for_event(arm_spe_pmus, nr_spes, evsel);
should you break if found_etm and found_spe are set? Or, indeed, error
and return directly as we do below? Indeed, I am not sure why you even
require auxtrace_event_cnt
> }
> +
> free(arm_spe_pmus);
>
> - if (found_etm && found_spe) {
> - pr_err("Concurrent ARM Coresight ETM and SPE operation not currently supported\n");
> + if (found_etm)
> + auxtrace_event_cnt++;
> +
> + if (found_spe)
> + auxtrace_event_cnt++;
> +
> + if (auxtrace_event_cnt > 1) {
> + pr_err("Concurrent AUX trace operation not currently supported\n");
> *err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> return NULL;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists