| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 22:09:04 +0800
From: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>
To: paulmck@...nel.org
Cc: mpe@...erman.id.au, npiggin@...il.com, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu,
atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lance@...osl.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next][RFC] powerpc: protect cpu offlining by RCU
offline lock
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 8:17 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 10:15:28AM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> > During the cpu offlining, the sub functions of xive_teardown_cpu will
> > call __lock_acquire when CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y. The latter function will
> > travel RCU protected list, so "WARNING: suspicious RCU usage" will be
> > triggered.
> >
> > Try to protect cpu offlining by RCU offline lock.
>
Thank Paul for your guidance!
> Rather than acquiring the RCU lock, why not change the functions called
> by xive_teardown_cpu() to avoid calling __lock_acquire()? For example,
> a call to spin_lock() could be changed to arch_spin_lock().
Great idea!
I will take a try, and perform new rounds of rcutorture tests. I will
submit a new version next week.
Also thank PPC developers for your patience on me ;-)
Cheers
Zhouyi
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> > Tested on PPC VM of Open Source Lab of Oregon State University.
> > (Each round of tests takes about 19 hours to finish)
> > Test results show that although "WARNING: suspicious RCU usage" has gone,
> > but there are more "BUG: soft lockup" reports than the original kernel
> > (10 vs 6), so I add a [RFC] to my subject line.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>
> > ---
> > [it seems that there are some delivery problem in my previous email,
> > so I send again via gmail, sorry for the trouble]
> >
> > Dear PPC and RCU developers
> >
> > I found this bug when trying to do rcutorture tests in ppc VM of
> > Open Source Lab of Oregon State University.
> >
> > console.log report following bug:
> > [ 37.635545][ T0] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage^M
> > [ 37.636409][ T0] 6.0.0-rc4-next-20220907-dirty #8 Not tainted^M
> > [ 37.637575][ T0] -----------------------------^M
> > [ 37.638306][ T0] kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3723 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!^M
> > [ 37.639651][ T0] ^M
> > [ 37.639651][ T0] other info that might help us debug this:^M
> > [ 37.639651][ T0] ^M
> > [ 37.641381][ T0] ^M
> > [ 37.641381][ T0] RCU used illegally from offline CPU!^M
> > [ 37.641381][ T0] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1^M
> > [ 37.667170][ T0] no locks held by swapper/6/0.^M
> > [ 37.668328][ T0] ^M
> > [ 37.668328][ T0] stack backtrace:^M
> > [ 37.669995][ T0] CPU: 6 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/6 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc4-next-20220907-dirty #8^M
> > [ 37.672777][ T0] Call Trace:^M
> > [ 37.673729][ T0] [c000000004653920] [c00000000097f9b4] dump_stack_lvl+0x98/0xe0 (unreliable)^M
> > [ 37.678579][ T0] [c000000004653960] [c0000000001f2eb8] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x148/0x16c^M
> > [ 37.680425][ T0] [c0000000046539f0] [c0000000001ed9b4] __lock_acquire+0x10f4/0x26e0^M
> > [ 37.682450][ T0] [c000000004653b30] [c0000000001efc2c] lock_acquire+0x12c/0x420^M
> > [ 37.684113][ T0] [c000000004653c20] [c0000000010d704c] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x6c/0xc0^M
> > [ 37.686154][ T0] [c000000004653c60] [c0000000000c7b4c] xive_spapr_put_ipi+0xcc/0x150^M
> > [ 37.687879][ T0] [c000000004653ca0] [c0000000010c72a8] xive_cleanup_cpu_ipi+0xc8/0xf0^M
> > [ 37.689856][ T0] [c000000004653cf0] [c0000000010c7370] xive_teardown_cpu+0xa0/0xf0^M
> > [ 37.691877][ T0] [c000000004653d30] [c0000000000fba5c] pseries_cpu_offline_self+0x5c/0x100^M
> > [ 37.693882][ T0] [c000000004653da0] [c00000000005d2c4] arch_cpu_idle_dead+0x44/0x60^M
> > [ 37.695739][ T0] [c000000004653dc0] [c0000000001c740c] do_idle+0x16c/0x3d0^M
> > [ 37.697536][ T0] [c000000004653e70] [c0000000001c7a1c] cpu_startup_entry+0x3c/0x40^M
> > [ 37.699694][ T0] [c000000004653ea0] [c00000000005ca20] start_secondary+0x6c0/0xb50^M
> > [ 37.701742][ T0] [c000000004653f90] [c00000000000d054] start_secondary_prolog+0x10/0x14^M
> >
> >
> > I am a beginner, hope I can be of some beneficial to the community ;-)
> >
> > Thanks
> > Zhouyi
> > --
> > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c | 5 ++++-
> > include/linux/rcupdate.h | 3 ++-
> > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
> > index 0f8cd8b06432..ddf66a253c70 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
> > @@ -64,11 +64,14 @@ static void pseries_cpu_offline_self(void)
> >
> > local_irq_disable();
> > idle_task_exit();
> > +
> > + /* Because the cpu is now offline, let rcu know that */
> > + rcu_state_ofl_lock();
> > if (xive_enabled())
> > xive_teardown_cpu();
> > else
> > xics_teardown_cpu();
> > -
> > + rcu_state_ofl_unlock();
> > unregister_slb_shadow(hwcpu);
> > rtas_stop_self();
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > index 63d2e6a60ad7..d857955a02ba 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > @@ -1034,5 +1034,6 @@ rcu_head_after_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t f)
> > /* kernel/ksysfs.c definitions */
> > extern int rcu_expedited;
> > extern int rcu_normal;
> > -
> > +void rcu_state_ofl_lock(void);
> > +void rcu_state_ofl_unlock(void);
> > #endif /* __LINUX_RCUPDATE_H */
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > index 6bb8e72bc815..3282725f1054 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -4796,6 +4796,16 @@ void __init rcu_init(void)
> > (void)start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited();
> > }
> >
> > +void rcu_state_ofl_lock(void)
> > +{
> > + arch_spin_lock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void rcu_state_ofl_unlock(void)
> > +{
> > + arch_spin_unlock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
> > +}
> > +
> > #include "tree_stall.h"
> > #include "tree_exp.h"
> > #include "tree_nocb.h"
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists