[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b6c2b3eb-a900-f94e-c472-39719faf65af@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 15:43:53 +0100
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
Cc: coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, mike.leach@...aro.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bhupesh.linux@...il.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] coresight: etm4x: Fix crash observed on Qcom ETM parts
with 'Low power override'
On 13/09/2022 11:52, Leo Yan wrote:
> Hi Bhupesh,
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 10:52:32AM +0530, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
>> Some Qualcomm ETM implementations require skipping powering up
>> the trace unit, as the ETMs are in the same power domain as
>> their CPU cores.
>>
>> Via commit 5214b563588e ("coresight: etm4x: Add support for
>> sysreg only devices"), the setting of 'skip_power_up' flag was
>> moved after the 'etm4_init_arch_data' function is called, whereas
>> the flag value is itself used inside the function. This causes
>> a crash when ETM mode 'Low-power state behavior override' is set
>> on some Qualcomm parts.
>>
>> Fix the same.
>>
>> Fixes: 5214b563588e ("coresight: etm4x: Add support for sysreg only devices")
>> Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>
>> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
>> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> - v1 can be seen here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220803191236.3037591-1-bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org/
>> - Addressed the review comments from Suzuki.
>> - Rebased on linux-next.
>>
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c | 13 +++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
>> index d39660a3e50c..14c1c7869795 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
>> @@ -977,6 +977,16 @@ static bool etm4_init_sysreg_access(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata,
>> if (!cpu_supports_sysreg_trace())
>> return false;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Some Qualcomm implementations require skipping powering up the trace unit,
>> + * as the ETMs are in the same power domain as their CPU cores.
>> + *
>> + * Since the 'skip_power_up' flag is used inside 'etm4_init_arch_data' function,
>> + * initialize it before the function is called.
>> + */
>> + if (fwnode_property_present(dev_fwnode(dev), "qcom,skip-power-up"))
>> + drvdata->skip_power_up = true;
>> +
>
> I personally think this sentence should be placed in the function
> etm4_probe(), you need to move it just before smp call
> etm4_init_arch_data(), this can allow DT property "qcom,skip-power-up"
> to be respected.
Or we could move this to init_iomem_access() and explicitly set the flag
to true in init_sysreg_access().
>
>> /*
>> * ETMs implementing sysreg access must implement TRCDEVARCH.
>> */
>> @@ -1951,8 +1961,7 @@ static int etm4_probe(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, u32 etm_pid)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> /* TRCPDCR is not accessible with system instructions. */
>> - if (!desc.access.io_mem ||
>> - fwnode_property_present(dev_fwnode(dev), "qcom,skip-power-up"))
>> + if (!desc.access.io_mem)
>> drvdata->skip_power_up = true;
>
> I prefer to move the condition checking for "desc.access.io_mem" to
> etm4_init_sysreg_access(), this can make sure the flag skip_power_up
> is set correctly based on property of system register access.
+1
>
> A side topic, in the mainline kernel I found the value
> "desc.access.io_mem" is always zero (see the initialized value in
> etm4_probe() and etm4_init_sysreg_access()). Should we initialize
> desc.access.io_mem to true in etm4_probe()?
Thats not true. It is initialised at :
etm4_init_iomem_access():
*csa = CSDEV_ACCESS_IOMEM(drvdata->base);
Where
#define CSDEV_ACCESS_IOMEM(_addr) \
((struct csdev_access) { \
.io_mem = true, \
.base = (_addr), \
})
Suzuki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists