[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YyHtKwzMH4yblJrD@google.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:03:07 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [patch RFC 10/29] kgbd: Pretend that console list walk is safe
On (22/09/11 00:27), Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Provide a special list iterator macro for KGDB to allow unprotected list
> walks and add a few comments to explain the hope based approach.
>
> Preperatory change for changing the console list to hlist and adding
> lockdep asserts to regular list walks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
[..]
> - for_each_console(c) {
> + /*
> + * This is a completely unprotected list walk designed by the
> + * wishful thinking departement. See the oops_inprogress comment
s/oops_inprogress/oops_in_progress/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists