[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220915193702.2201018-1-abrestic@rivosinc.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 15:37:00 -0400
From: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...osinc.com>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Celeste Liu <coelacanthus@...look.com>,
dram <dramforever@...e.com>, Ruizhe Pan <c141028@...il.com>,
Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...osinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] Make mmap() with PROT_WRITE imply PROT_READ
Commit 2139619bcad7 ("riscv: mmap with PROT_WRITE but no PROT_READ is
invalid") made mmap() reject mappings with only PROT_WRITE set in an
attempt to fix an observed inconsistency in behavior when attempting
to read from a PROT_WRITE-only mapping. The root cause of this behavior
was actually that while RISC-V's protection_map maps VM_WRITE to
readable PTE permissions (since write-only PTEs are considered reserved
by the privileged spec), the page fault handler considered loads from
VM_WRITE-only VMAs illegal accesses. Fix the underlying cause by
handling faults in VM_WRITE-only VMAs (patch 1) and then re-enable
use of mmap(PROT_WRITE) (patch 2), making RISC-V's behavior consistent
with all other architectures that don't support write-only PTEs.
Both patches are tagged as fixes for the aforementioned commit since that
commit made a userspace visible change that will break any software relying
on mmap(PROT_WRITE). (Also cc: stable since the offending commit was
itself backported to stable).
v1 -> v2: Allow handling of load faults in VM_WRITE VMAs
v2 -> v3: Split into two pathces
v3 -> v4: Fixes tags (+ this cover letter)
Andrew Bresticker (2):
riscv: Make VM_WRITE imply VM_READ
riscv: Allow PROT_WRITE-only mmap()
arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c | 3 ---
arch/riscv/mm/fault.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists