lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 15 Sep 2022 13:10:03 +0530
From:   Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <pabeni@...hat.com>, <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        <vladimir.oltean@....com>, <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        <vigneshr@...com>, <nsekhar@...com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <kishon@...com>,
        <s-vadapalli@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: Update
 bindings for J721e CPSW9G

Hello Rob,

On 14/09/22 21:53, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 03:20:46PM +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
>> Update bindings for TI K3 J721e SoC which contains 9 ports (8 external
>> ports) CPSW9G module and add compatible for it.
>>
>> Changes made:
>>     - Add new compatible ti,j721e-cpswxg-nuss for CPSW9G.
>>     - Extend pattern properties for new compatible.
>>     - Change maximum number of CPSW ports to 8 for new compatible.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>
>> ---
>>  .../bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml   | 23 +++++++++++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> What's the base for this patch? It didn't apply for me.

I was working with linux-next tagged: next-20220913.

> 
> Run 'make dt_binding_check'. It should point out the issue I did. If 
> not, let me know.

Sure. Thank you.

Regards,
Siddharth.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ