linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Objtool toolchain proposal: -fannotate-{jump-table,noreturn}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 15 Sep 2022 10:47:01 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@...wei.com>
Cc:     Michael Matz <matz@...e.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
        linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org,
        Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@...cle.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch@....org>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Sathvika Vasireddy <sv@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Objtool toolchain proposal:
 -fannotate-{jump-table,noreturn}

On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 10:56:58AM +0800, Chen Zhongjin wrote:

> We have found some anonymous information on x86 in .rodata.

Well yes, but that's still a bunch of heuristics on our side.

> I'm not sure if those are *all* of Josh wanted on x86, however for arm64 we
> did not found that in the same section so it is a problem on arm64 now.

Nick found Bolt managed the ARM64 jumptables:

  https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/bolt/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64MCPlusBuilder.cpp#L484

But that does look like a less than ideal solution too.

> Does the compiler will emit these for all arches? At lease I tried and
> didn't find anything meaningful (maybe I omitted it).

That's the question; can we get the compiler to help us here in a well
defined manner.