lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <166323429229.2397913.17024770218235834185.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 15 Sep 2022 10:31:32 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1] spi: fsl_spi: Convert to transfer_one

On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 15:38:37 +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Let the core handle all the chipselect bakery and replace
> transfer_one_message() by transfer_one() and prepare_message().
> 
> At the time being, there is fsl_spi_cs_control() to handle
> chipselects. That function handles both GPIO and non-GPIO
> chipselects. The GPIO chipselects will now be handled by
> the core directly, so only handle non-GPIO chipselects and
> hook it to ->set_cs
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: fsl_spi: Convert to transfer_one
      commit: 64ca1a034f00bf6366701df0af9194a6425d5406

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ