linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] pinctrl: ocelot: Fix interrupt controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220915112247.fin7bb45plnr7cme@soft-dev3-1.localhost>
Date:   Thu, 15 Sep 2022 13:22:47 +0200
From:   Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:     <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] pinctrl: ocelot: Fix interrupt controller

The 09/14/2022 15:02, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 4:55 PM Horatiu Vultur
> <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com> wrote:
> 
> > Fixes: be36abb71d878f ("pinctrl: ocelot: add support for interrupt controller")
> > Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
> 
> This v3 patch applied for fixes so we get some rotation in linux-next
> and get the Ocelot kernel in working order.
> Should it even be tagged for stable?

Thanks for applying the patch!

It would be great to go also in stable. I have tried to apply it on
5.19, 5.15, 5.10, 5.4, 4.19 but it failed on all of them because of
merge conflicts.
Should I send separate patch for each stable tree?

> 
> Andy had some further things to think about, consider these
> for possible further patching.
> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

-- 
/Horatiu