[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2839a437-a57a-ffc4-da8e-dde9a9a9a5cc@opensource.cirrus.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 13:20:22 +0100
From: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To: Martin Povišer <povik+lin@...ebit.org>,
James Schulman <james.schulman@...rus.com>,
David Rhodes <david.rhodes@...rus.com>,
"Lucas Tanure" <tanureal@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
CC: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>,
Matt Flax <flatmax@...tmax.com>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
- <patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<asahi@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] ASoC: cs42l42: Split probe() and remove() into
stages
On 15/09/2022 10:44, Martin Povišer wrote:
> From: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
>
> To prepare for adding SoundWire the probe must be split into three
> parts:
>
> 1) The bus-specific probe
> 2) Common bus-agnostic probe steps
> 3) Initialization of the peripheral registers
>
> Step (3) must be separate because on SoundWire devices the probe must
> enable power supplies and release reset so that the peripheral can be
> enumerated by the bus, but it isn't possible to access registers until
> enumeration has completed.
>
> The call to devm_snd_soc_register_component() must be done at stage (2)
> so that it can EPROBE_DEFER if necessary. In SoundWire systems stage (3)
> is not a probe event so a deferral at this stage would not result in
> re-probing dependencies.
>
> A new init_done flag indicates that the chip has been identified and
> initialized. This is used to prevent cs42l42_remove(), cs42l42_suspend(),
> cs42l42_restore() and cs42l42_irq_thread() from attempting register
> accesses if the chip was not successfully initialized. Although this
> cannot happen on I2C, because the entire probe would fail, it is
> possible on SoundWire if probe succeeds but the cs42l42 is never
> enumerated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Povišer <povik+lin@...ebit.org>
> ---
> sound/soc/codecs/cs42l42.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> sound/soc/codecs/cs42l42.h | 2 +
> 2 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/cs42l42.c b/sound/soc/codecs/cs42l42.c
> index 11cb659f03e0..427b29db2252 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/cs42l42.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/cs42l42.c
> @@ -1627,7 +1627,7 @@ static irqreturn_t cs42l42_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
> int report = 0;
>
> mutex_lock(&cs42l42->irq_lock);
> - if (cs42l42->suspended) {
> + if (cs42l42->suspended || !cs42l42->init_done) {
> mutex_unlock(&cs42l42->irq_lock);
> return IRQ_NONE;
> }
This doesn't apply to broonie/for-next. Needs rebasing onto commit:
ea75deef1a73 ("ASoC: cs42l42: Only report button state if there was a
button interrupt")
Powered by blists - more mailing lists