[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220915124215.13703-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 13:42:15 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: vkoul@...nel.org
Cc: yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com,
pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, sanyog.r.kale@...el.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, quic_srivasam@...cinc.com,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] soundwire: qcom: update status from device id 1
By default autoenumeration is enabled on QCom SoundWire controller
which means the core should not be dealing with device 0 w.r.t enumeration.
Currently device 0 status is also shared with SoundWire core which confuses
the core sometimes and we endup adding 0:0:0:0 slave device.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
---
drivers/soundwire/qcom.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
index e21a3306bf01..871e4d8b32c7 100644
--- a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ static int qcom_swrm_get_alert_slave_dev_num(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS, &val);
- for (dev_num = 0; dev_num <= SDW_MAX_DEVICES; dev_num++) {
+ for (dev_num = 1; dev_num <= SDW_MAX_DEVICES; dev_num++) {
status = (val >> (dev_num * SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS_SZ));
if ((status & SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS_MASK) == SDW_SLAVE_ALERT) {
@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ static void qcom_swrm_get_device_status(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_SLV_STATUS, &val);
ctrl->slave_status = val;
- for (i = 0; i <= SDW_MAX_DEVICES; i++) {
+ for (i = 1; i <= SDW_MAX_DEVICES; i++) {
u32 s;
s = (val >> (i * 2));
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists