lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 15 Sep 2022 08:09:24 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>
Cc:     Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
        Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
        asahi@...ts.linux.dev, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:BLUETOOTH DRIVERS" <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dt-bindings: net: Add Broadcom BCM4377 family PCIe Bluetooth

On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 4:12 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 01:19:17PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 07/09/2022 19:09, Sven Peter wrote:
> > > These chips are combined Wi-Fi/Bluetooth radios which expose a
> > > PCI subfunction for the Bluetooth part.
> > > They are found in Apple machines such as the x86 models with the T2
> > > chip or the arm64 models with the M1 or M2 chips.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>
> > > ---

> > > +examples:
> > > +  - |
> > > +    pcie {
> > > +      #address-cells = <3>;
> > > +      #size-cells = <2>;
> > > +
> > > +      bluetooth@0,1 {
> >
> > The unit address seems to be different than reg.
>
> Right, this says dev 0, func 1.

Actually, the reg value of 0x100 is correct. func is bits 8-10. dev
starts in bit 11.

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ