[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YyMt2cWtHC2SeG62@work>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 14:51:21 +0100
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: mux: harden i2c_mux_alloc() against integer
overflows
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 02:30:58PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> A couple years back we went through the kernel an automatically
> converted size calculations to use struct_size() instead. The
> struct_size() calculation is protected against integer overflows.
>
> However it does not make sense to use the result from struct_size()
> for additional math operations as that would negate any safeness.
Right; there most be a couple more similar cases out there. I'll
look for them and fix them. Thanks!
>
> Fixes: 1f3b69b6b939 ("i2c: mux: Use struct_size() in devm_kzalloc()")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
--
Gustavo
> ---
> drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c
> index 774507b54b57..313904be5f3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c
> @@ -243,9 +243,10 @@ struct i2c_mux_core *i2c_mux_alloc(struct i2c_adapter *parent,
> int (*deselect)(struct i2c_mux_core *, u32))
> {
> struct i2c_mux_core *muxc;
> + size_t mux_size;
>
> - muxc = devm_kzalloc(dev, struct_size(muxc, adapter, max_adapters)
> - + sizeof_priv, GFP_KERNEL);
> + mux_size = struct_size(muxc, adapter, max_adapters);
> + muxc = devm_kzalloc(dev, size_add(mux_size, sizeof_priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!muxc)
> return NULL;
> if (sizeof_priv)
> --
> 2.35.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists