linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND] docs: x86: move do_IRQ to common_interrupt in entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 15 Sep 2022 08:48:30 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     Tuo Cao <91tuocao@...il.com>, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
        hpa@...or.com, corbet@....net
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND] docs: x86: move do_IRQ to common_interrupt in
 entry_64.rst

On 9/13/22 22:28, Tuo Cao wrote:
> do_IRQ has been replaced by common_interrupt in commit
> fa5e5c409213 ("x86/entry: Use idtentry for interrupts").
> Move do_IRQ to common_interrupt.
> <snip>...
> -   magically-generated functions that make their way to do_IRQ with
> -   the interrupt number as a parameter.
> +   magically-generated functions that make their way to common_interrupt
> +   with the interrupt number as a parameter.
>  

Above is not moving something; but rather replace mentions to do_IRQ
in the documentation with common_interrupt.

Please rework the patch subject and description.

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara