linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/3] iommu/s390: Fix duplicate domain attachments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220915151402.121032-2-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Sep 2022 17:14:00 +0200
From:   Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev
Cc:     linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com,
        hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
        gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
        svens@...ux.ibm.com, joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org,
        robin.murphy@....com, jgg@...dia.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] iommu/s390: Fix duplicate domain attachments

Since commit fa7e9ecc5e1c ("iommu/s390: Tolerate repeat attach_dev
calls") we can end up with duplicates in the list of devices attached to
a domain. This is inefficient and confusing since only one domain can
actually be in control of the IOMMU translations for a device. Fix this
by detaching the device from the previous domain, if any, on attach.
This also makes the restore behavior analogous between IOMMU and DMA API
control.

Fixes: fa7e9ecc5e1c ("iommu/s390: Tolerate repeat attach_dev calls")
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c
index c898bcbbce11..de8f76775240 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c
@@ -83,14 +83,41 @@ static void s390_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
 	kfree(s390_domain);
 }
 
+static bool __s390_iommu_detach_device(struct s390_domain *s390_domain,
+				     struct zpci_dev *zdev)
+{
+	struct s390_domain_device *domain_device, *tmp;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	bool found = false;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(domain_device, tmp, &s390_domain->devices,
+				 list) {
+		if (domain_device->zdev == zdev) {
+			list_del(&domain_device->list);
+			kfree(domain_device);
+			found = true;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
+
+	if (found) {
+		zdev->s390_domain = NULL;
+		zpci_unregister_ioat(zdev, 0);
+	}
+	return found;
+}
+
 static int s390_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
 				    struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct s390_domain *s390_domain = to_s390_domain(domain);
 	struct zpci_dev *zdev = to_zpci_dev(dev);
 	struct s390_domain_device *domain_device;
+	struct s390_domain *prev_domain = NULL;
 	unsigned long flags;
-	int cc, rc;
+	int cc, rc = 0;
 
 	if (!zdev)
 		return -ENODEV;
@@ -99,16 +126,16 @@ static int s390_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
 	if (!domain_device)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	if (zdev->dma_table && !zdev->s390_domain) {
-		cc = zpci_dma_exit_device(zdev);
-		if (cc) {
+	if (zdev->s390_domain) {
+		prev_domain = zdev->s390_domain;
+		if (!__s390_iommu_detach_device(zdev->s390_domain, zdev))
+			rc = -EIO;
+	} else if (zdev->dma_table) {
+		if (zpci_dma_exit_device(zdev))
 			rc = -EIO;
-			goto out_free;
-		}
 	}
-
-	if (zdev->s390_domain)
-		zpci_unregister_ioat(zdev, 0);
+	if (rc)
+		goto out_free;
 
 	zdev->dma_table = s390_domain->dma_table;
 	cc = zpci_register_ioat(zdev, 0, zdev->start_dma, zdev->end_dma,
@@ -129,7 +156,7 @@ static int s390_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
 		   domain->geometry.aperture_end != zdev->end_dma) {
 		rc = -EINVAL;
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
-		goto out_restore;
+		goto out_unregister_restore;
 	}
 	domain_device->zdev = zdev;
 	zdev->s390_domain = s390_domain;
@@ -138,14 +165,15 @@ static int s390_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
 
 	return 0;
 
+out_unregister_restore:
+	zpci_unregister_ioat(zdev, 0);
 out_restore:
-	if (!zdev->s390_domain) {
+	zdev->dma_table = NULL;
+	if (prev_domain)
+		s390_iommu_attach_device(&prev_domain->domain,
+					 dev);
+	else
 		zpci_dma_init_device(zdev);
-	} else {
-		zdev->dma_table = zdev->s390_domain->dma_table;
-		zpci_register_ioat(zdev, 0, zdev->start_dma, zdev->end_dma,
-				   virt_to_phys(zdev->dma_table));
-	}
 out_free:
 	kfree(domain_device);
 
@@ -157,30 +185,14 @@ static void s390_iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
 {
 	struct s390_domain *s390_domain = to_s390_domain(domain);
 	struct zpci_dev *zdev = to_zpci_dev(dev);
-	struct s390_domain_device *domain_device, *tmp;
-	unsigned long flags;
-	int found = 0;
+	bool detached;
 
 	if (!zdev)
 		return;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(domain_device, tmp, &s390_domain->devices,
-				 list) {
-		if (domain_device->zdev == zdev) {
-			list_del(&domain_device->list);
-			kfree(domain_device);
-			found = 1;
-			break;
-		}
-	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&s390_domain->list_lock, flags);
-
-	if (found && (zdev->s390_domain == s390_domain)) {
-		zdev->s390_domain = NULL;
-		zpci_unregister_ioat(zdev, 0);
+	detached = __s390_iommu_detach_device(s390_domain, zdev);
+	if (detached)
 		zpci_dma_init_device(zdev);
-	}
 }
 
 static struct iommu_device *s390_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
-- 
2.34.1