[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220916223600.aokvipptiwdheand@skbuf>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 22:36:00 +0000
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 net-next 2/8] net: mscc: ocelot: expose regfield
definition to be used by other drivers
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:44:56AM -0700, Colin Foster wrote:
> I'm assuming you'll agree with my a-ha moment regarding ocelot_reset()
> being in the ocelot_lib.
>
> There might be a few others as well. Should I add them as more "export
> function X" commits, or squash them (and these already-reviewed commits)
> in a larger "export a bunch of resources and symbols" type commit to
> keep the patch count low?
Try to keep patches doing one thing and one thing well (and leave this
patch alone).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists